Loading
We the undersigned
  • WTU Home
    • WTU Open letter
    • Who we are
    • Our story
    • Our Mission Statement
  • Cannabis Research
  • Help us
  • Testimonials
  • WTU Guest Book
  • Mechandise
  • Blog Posts
  • Our Friends
    • Collaboration
    • Survey for Case Studies
    • Members Gallery
    • WTU Member cases
    • WTU Member poems
    • WTU Members artwork
    • WTU Members recipes
  • Contact Us
    • Submit Media Emails
  • Search
  • Menu
  • WE THE UNDERSIGNED

    FIGHTING TOWARDS DECRIMINALISATION

  • WE THE UNDERSIGNED

    FIGHTING TOWARDS DECRIMINALISATION

  • WE THE UNDERSIGNED

    FIGHTING TOWARDS DECRIMINALISATION

PreviousNext
123

RECREATIONAL OR MEDICAL: A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE ?

What is the difference – how might we distinguish – between the recreational use of cannabis and the medical? : a question this that is bound to be at the forefront of discussion when government representatives debate the issue of legalisation.

According to the law, until 1971 cannabis was a substance of potential therapeutic value: it could be prescribed medically. During that year however, with The Misuse of Drugs Act, its status was re-defined: it ceased to be legal. The Government had performed an about turn.

This was largely due to British agreement with the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotics of 1961, in which cannabis was classified as a dangerous drug of no therapeutic value. The British Government claimed that cannabis was being misused as a recreational drug.

The justification of the new law has always seemed spurious, and as time has passed increasingly so.

To begin with the negative case against the ruling: cannabis is not nicotine, is not alcohol. It is incomparably less dangerous than these, if dangerous at all.

There has not been a single instance of reported death for which cannabis is directly responsible, whereas, repeatedly, studies have linked tobacco with cancer, with high blood pressure, and with emphysema and a variety of other lethal conditions. Yet it is cannabis that is outlawed, while tobacco, currently, is available in Britain to anyone over 16-years-old.

And as with nicotine, so with alcohol; and intoxication. No study has been able to establish that the ‘high’ or intoxicated state that results commonly from the smoking of cannabis has behavioural consequences of a significantly pernicious kind. Indeed the consequences are by and large benign.

This is hardly the case – to put it mildly – where alcohol is concerned. Alcohol-addiction is the world’s most debilitating and destructive disease. Yet in general, in Britain and the Western World, it is alcohol that is the socially approved and permitted option, and the legally endorsed; not cannabis.

We turn now to the more positive argument for reversing the 1971 ruling. What at once needs emphasising at this point is the unbifurcated, holistic nature of our purpose. We are not campaigning for the recreational and medicinal usage of cannabis (to bring ourselves round again to our initial question), for to state the case that way is to presuppose in our argument, or to build into it, a false dichotomy. As far as we are concerned, the recreational very largely is the medicinal, the medicinal the recreational. We are aware, for instance, nowadays, that cannabis can contribute valuably to the treatment of nausea, chronic pain, asthma, multiple sclerosis and various other ailments. Yet to affirm this baldly could conceivably mislead, by obscuring more subtle propositions. We might be truer to our cause if we began with the proposition that cannabis is a mode of self-medication. Animals, we hear, self-medicate by digesting plants and other matter. And so possibly with human beings: many if not most cannabis users (so some researchers believe) are intuitively medicating themselves for stress and / or depression. Which is a way of saying that the cannabis user is not for the most part a person in quest of a ‘high’, or seeking consciously the cure for an ailment, but a human being searching intuitively for recreation: the re-creating of himself (or herself).

This might all seem, and in fact in part obviously is, hypothetical: the jury is still out where self-medication is concerned.

For all that, what is at stake here is an issue we cannot and should not ignore. The cannabis user does himself and his cause no favours – the established opposition being what it is, an embattled force led by people with a propensity to simplistic thought – if he himself understates the complexity and subtlety of his essential purposes.

His theme ought to be that the line between the medical and recreational use of cannabis is blurred, and probably non-existent.

Pages

  • Blog Posts
  • Cannabis Research
  • Collaboration
  • Contact Us
  • Help us
  • Mechandise
  • Members Gallery
  • Our Friends
  • Our Mission Statement
  • Our story
  • Privacy Policy
  • Submit
  • Survey for Case Studies
  • Testimonials
  • Who we are
  • WTU Guest Book
  • WTU Home
  • WTU Member cases
  • WTU Member poems
  • WTU Members artwork
  • WTU Members recipes
  • WTU Open letter
  • WTU Sponsorship

Categories

  • News

Archive

  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • May 2019

Thank You

I would like to thank everyone for their support.

Phil Monk

Privacy Policy

  • Help me hemp Helping the WTUMarch 20, 2021 - 1:18 pm
  • Canna-Kingdom Helping the WTUMarch 20, 2021 - 12:57 pm
  • Email harvestJanuary 4, 2021 - 6:11 pm
facebook



Site by Python IT Ltd
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings

How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, you cannot refuse them without impacting how our site functions. You can block or delete them by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds: